Re-balance Cycle Reminder All MyPlanIQ’s newsletters are archived here.

For regular SAA and TAA portfolios, the next re-balance will be on Monday, May 2, 2016. You can also find the re-balance calendar for 2015 on ‘Dashboard‘ page once you log in.

As a reminder to expert users: advanced portfolios are still re-balanced based on their original re-balance schedules and they are not the same as those used in Strategic and Tactical Asset Allocation (SAA and TAA) portfolios of a plan.

Please note that we now list the next re-balance date on every portfolio page.

Performance Comparison Between Strategic And Tactical Allocation

We have discussed several times on the recent performance of the tactical and strategic asset allocation based portfolios. The following are the two recent reviews: 

We have pointed out that the underperformance of our portfolios, compared with US stocks and US stocks/US bonds balance portfolios, is mostly due to their exposure in international stocks. Indeed, most global balanced allocation mutual funds and portfolios provided by other parties including robo advisors have suffered recently. Furthermore, when compared with these portfolios, our portfolios have fared well, if not better. 

In this newsletter, we will compare the performance of our strategic and tactical portfolios. The purpose is to understand the nature of these portfolios. 

Strategic vs. Tactical Portfolios

We look at the first two tables on our Brokerage Investors page (What We Do -> Brokerage Investors): 

Latest Brokerage Specific ETF Tactical Portfolio Performance Comparison

Latest Brokerage Specific ETF Strategic Optimal Portfolio Performance Comparison

These portfolios are ETF based. Since all ETFs are index ETFs, the comparison eliminate the bias of actively managed funds that sometimes can have large impact on performance. 

So far this year, the tactical portfolios have done better than the strategic portfolios in most cases. The same difference actually extends beyond year to date.

Tactical better strategic portfolios in longer terms

We construct the following table based on the above table in order to see the difference in the last 5 years and 10 years (SAA: Strategic Asset Allocation, TAA: Tactical Asset Allocation): 

  SAA 5Yr  TAA 5 Yr 5Yr Diff SAA 10 Yr TAA 10 Yr 10 Yr Diff
Fidelity 4.70% 4.40% 0.30% 4.60% 7.10% -2.50%
Schwab 3.00% 3.70% -0.70%     0.00%
TDAmeritrade 2.30% 4.20% -1.90% 3.20% 6.20% -3.00%
Vanguard 3.80% 4.70% -0.90% 4.30% 7.70% -3.40%
Etrade 3.40% 5.30% -1.90% 4.60% 9.00% -4.40%
Six Core 3.90% 3.40% 0.50% 4.30% 8.00% -3.70%
MyPlanIQ Core 3.70% 3.90% -0.20% 4.70% 8% -3.30%
Retirement Inc 4.90% 4.20% 0.70% 5.10% 7.70% -2.60%
Average Difference   -0.51%     -2.86%

Though many users have an impression that strategic portfolios have done ‘better’ for the past several years, the performance difference for the past 5 years indicates otherwise! Notice that the past 5 year performance of most portfolios is the live performance, not the back test performance as we first went live in 2010. Again, this wrong impression stems from the strength of US stocks for the past several years in this cycle. However, international and emerging market stocks actually have had very anemic if not dismal performance for the past 5 years:

Five Major Asset Past Performance (as of 4/4/2016):
Ticker/Portfolio Name YTD
Return**
1Yr AR 3Yr AR 5Yr AR 10Yr AR
VNQ (Vanguard REIT ETF) 4.9% 2.7% 9.0% 11.0% 6.4%
VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) 1.0% -0.2% 11.3% 10.9% 7.0%
VEA (Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF) -3.8% -9.9% 2.3% 1.8%  
VWO (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF) 4.9% -14.8% -4.3% -4.7% 2.7%
DBC (PowerShares DB Commodity Tracking ETF) -2.1% -24.7% -21.8% -15.7% -5.2%

For the 10 year performance, all TAA portfolios have done better than their SAA counterparts by some significant margins: close to 3% annually. The large difference is mostly due to the big loss of the SAA portfolios during the financial crisis in 2008-2009. 

Comparison with other global funds and portfolios

In the following table, we compare our SAA/TAA portfolios with a few global allocation funds and portfolios:

Portfolio Performance Comparison (as of 4/4/2016):

Ticker/Portfolio Name YTD
Return**
1Yr AR 3Yr AR 5Yr AR 10Yr AR
Wealthfront Moderate Portfolio 2.1% -3.0% 3.4% 3.8%  
7Twelve Original Portfolio 2.7% -6.7% 1.7% 2.4% 4.3%
MyPlanIQ Diversified Core Allocation ETF Plan Tactical Asset Allocation Moderate 3.0% -3.2% 3.1% 3.9% 8.1%
MyPlanIQ Diversified Core Allocation ETF Plan Strategic Asset Allocation – Optimal Moderate 2.3% -1.8% 3.2% 3.7% 4.7%
MALOX (BlackRock Global Allocation Instl) -0.9% -4.8% 3.7% 3.4% 5.4%
GBMFX (GMO Benchmark-Free Allocation III) 0.2% -5.5% 1.4% 3.8% 5.3%
PASDX (PIMCO All Asset D) 4.1% -6.3% -1.8% 1.7% 3.9%
RIRGX (American Funds Capital Inc Bldr R6) 2.9% -1.3% 5.4% 6.7%  

Other than RIRGX (American Funds Capital Inc Bldr R6), our portfolios have done better than other portfolios and funds. American Funds Capital Income Builder (RIRGX) is a very popular allocation fund among financial advisors (you have to purchase an American Funds mutual fund through a financial advisor or a retirement plan). Based on Morningstar, its allocation is: 

Not only the fund has overweighted US stocks, its bond and cash allocation is about 20%, which should be really compared with our growth allocation portfolio. In 2008, the portfolio (RIRFX, the R5 class as R6 didn’t exist at that time) lost 30%, compared with -25% loss of MyPlanIQ Diversified Core Allocation ETF Plan Strategic Asset Allocation – Optimal Moderate.

Market Overview

US stocks are now in a positive trend. However, developed country stocks are still in red year to date (-3.2% for VEA). It’s somewhat surprising that emerging market stocks have staged a strong rally year to date (5.6% year to date and 9% in 13 weeks for VWO). Markets are again tilted to the risk on mode. However, global economy and corporate earnings are still in a very mixed picture. We still maintain our caution. 

For more detailed asset trend scores, please refer to 360° Market Overview

We would like to remind our readers that markets are more precarious now than other times in the last 6 years. Since the financial crisis in 2008-2009, we have not seen substantial structural change in the U.S., European and emerging market economies. Even though U.S. stocks have had a recent correction, their valuation is still at a historical high level.  It is thus not a good time to take excessive risk. 

We again would like to stress for any new investor and new money, the best way to step into this kind of markets is through dollar cost average (DCA), i.e. invest and/or follow a model portfolio in several phases (such as 2 or 3 months) instead of the whole sum at one shot. 

Latest Articles

Enjoy Newsletter

How can we improve this newsletter? Please take our survey 

–Thanks to those who have already contributed — we appreciate it.

Disclaimer:
Any investment in securities including mutual funds, ETFs, closed end funds, stocks and any other securities could lose money over any period of time. All investments involve risk. Losses may exceed the principal invested. Past performance is not an indicator of future performance. There is no guarantee for future results in your investment and any other actions based on the information provided on the website including, but not limited to, strategies, portfolios, articles, performance data and results of any tools. All rights are reserved and enforced. By accessing the website, you agree not to copy and redistribute the information provided herein without the explicit consent from MyPlanIQ.