 |
Vanguard ETF: |  |
7.4%* |
|
Diversified Core: | |
8.1%* |
|
Six Core Asset ETFs: | |
7.3%* |
Articles on LWC
- Goldman Sachs Tactical Strategy Examined With Fewer ETFs in the Portfolio
12/17/2010
Goldman Sachs Global Tactical Asset Allocation portfolios were an early leader in tactical asset allocation strategies. Their strategy is a type of cross-asset (or multi-asset) momentum based tactical asset allocation.
In a previous article we took a simplified interpretation of the strategy and showed how it could be cloned with ETFs.
The simplified strategy is:
On a monthly (or quarterly basis), from six asset classes: US equity, International equity, Emerging Markets, Real Estate, Commodities, US aggregate bond,
-
Calculate the previous 12 month return.
-
Rank the returns among these 6 assets.
-
Choose the top 3 assets and invest in these top 3 assets in equal amounts.
-
Any asset has to score higher than CASH to qualify for the purchase.
In this development, we examine what would happen if the strategy only picks the best one, or the top two, funds as opposed to always having three.
The funds we used and their ETF counterparts are:
Fund
ETF
Description
VFINX
(VTI)
Total Stock Market
VGTSX
(EFA)
International Stock
VEIEX
(EEM)
Emerging Markets
VGSIX
(IYR)
Real Estate
QRAAX
(DBC)
Commodities
VFISX
(SHY)
Short Term Bond
VFITX
(IEI)
Intermediate Bond
VUSTX
(TLT)
Long Term Bond
VFSTX
(AGG)
Aggregate Bond
VFICX
(MBB)
Intermediate Bond
VWESX
(LWC)
Long Term Bond
VWEHX
(HYG)
High Yield Bond
VFIIX
(IEI)
Intermediate Bond
BEGBX
(BWX)
International Treasury Bond
VIPSX
(TIP)
Inflation Protected Bond
click to enlarge
Portfolio Performance Comparison
Portfolio Name 1Yr AR 1Yr Sharpe 3Yr AR 3Yr Sharpe 5Yr AR 5Yr Sharpe P Goldman Sachs Global Tactical Small Cap Include Emerging Market Diversified Bonds 8% 40% 11% 61% 15% 81% Goldman Sachs One Fund 8% 30% 13% 50% 18% 71% Goldman Sachs Two Fund 11% 52% 11% 62% 17% 91% We can see that each of the strategies exhibit different performance parameters with the two fund strategy appearing to give the best overall performance.
If we add the drawdown ratios:
Draw Down
1 Yr
3 Yr
5 Yr
Inception
Three Fund
14%
14%
18%
18%
Two Fund
14%
17%
18%
18%
One Fund
17%
33%
33%
33%
We can see that the additional funds reduce the drawdowns - there is a large jump going from two funds to three funds.
Consideration of the number of funds to select will have an impact on the behavior of the portfolio.
In this case, the two fund portfolio appears to inherit the best properties, whereas the one fund portfolio can give good returns, but at some cost to ulcers.
It may be worth considering moving to two funds in some cases.
labels:investment,
Symbols:AGG,BWX,DBC,EEM,EFA,HYG,IEI,IYR,LWC,MBB,SHY,TIP,TLT,VTI,
-
