July 25th 2011: Why Tactical Asset Allocation
07/25/2011 0 comments
In this newsletter, we first answer an easier question: why Tactical Asset Allocation (TAA)?
In our previous newsletters, we introduced SAA (Strategic Asset Allocation) that is based on mainstream portfolio theory and widely practiced in professional asset managers. The strategy is the foundation of portfolio building, especially its asset class and diversification concept. However, the question arises: is this enough?
Let's take a look at how SAA performed in the previous two bear markets. The following shows how six core asset SAA, three core asset SAA, VBINX (Vanguard balanced fund index, 60% stocks/40% bonds) and VFINX (Vanguard 500 Index) did in 2001, 2002 and 2008.
2001 | 2002 | 2008 | |
Six Core SAA | 0.69% | -2.74% | -24.47% |
Three Core SAA | -5.1% | -7.92% | -24.84% |
VBINX | -3.03% | -9.55% | -22.21% |
VFINX | -12.03 | -22.17 | -37.02% |
See here for more detailed comparison.
It is clear that diversification does help but losing a quarter of your portfolio is one year is not a light matter, in fact, it is quite detrimental to many retirement accounts.
SAA is based on a crucial assumption: in the long run, major assets such as stocks, REITs and commodities will go up. Can one simply trust this? Furthermore, how long is the long run?
For U.S. stocks, we quote the following from our recent article:
Here are some key points cited by Marketwatch.com's Howard Gold from his interviews with the authors (two professors who wrote a paper Are Stocks Really Less Volatile in the Long Run?):
- There have been periods in which stocks underperformed [Treasury] bonds and bills over 30 years, [and] 40-year periods in which stocks barely [outperformed] bonds.
- Even with 200 years of stock data (Dow Jones Industrial Index (DJI) and S&P 500 (SPY)) supporting Siegel's claim, the U.S. faces a lot of uncertainty. The past 200 years have been very kind to the U.S., [but] there's some probability you might lose a war. There's some probability you might have a financial meltdown. There's no guarantee we're going to bounce back.
As what we stated in our recent newsletter, the intuition behind holding U.S. stocks for a long run is that if you are certain that in the long run, the U.S. economy will be resilient and prosperous. The problem here is what it means for 'the long run'. Is that 100 or 200 years? Or is that 10 or 20 years? For the very very long run, in theory, this author personally believes that the U.S. political and economic systems are still the best among the world and thus it is highly possible for the economy to do well. But for the coming 10 or 20 years?
For an average person, 10 or 20 years is a long time. In 10 or 20 years, our children will graduate from college, we will retire or might have enjoyed our retirement for a while (assuming we properly manage our health and finance), ... etc.. For such a "long term", it is even more important to take care of your own retirement portfolios by using the right strategies.
Well, it is simple to answer that why we need an alternative to SAA. But the much harder question is what kind of strategies? In the follow up newsletters, we will attempt to answer this.
Market Overview
Last week saw a big hurry to chase risk assets:
- All risk assets rose substantially, with international developed market stocks (European stocks) rose most.
- Gold and REITs are still solidly in the top two spots.
- Among all the major asset classes monitored, only treasury bonds and bills lost.
We are still at a tricky spot: with U.S. debt ceiling talk breaking down, we'll see how markets are going to react.
For more information on how these assets are ranked, please see here.
Benchmark Portfolios
Our Retirement Income ETFs model portfolios have been steady this year. The following shows the performance of the two model portfolios
Portfolio Performance Comparison
Portfolio/Fund Name | 1Yr AR | 1Yr Sharpe | 3Yr AR | 3Yr Sharpe | 5Yr AR | 5Yr Sharpe |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Retirement Income ETFs Strategic Asset Allocation Moderate | 16% | 167% | 6% | 29% | 6% | 28% |
Retirement Income ETFs Tactical Asset Allocation Moderate | 14% | 151% | 12% | 96% | 11% | 82% |
VBINX | 17% | 203% | 6% | 32% | 5% | 28% |
VFINX | 25% | 151% | 4% | 15% | 3% | 8% |
Year to date, SAA 6.59%, TAA 5.22%, compared with VBINX's 6.42% and VFINX 8% respectively. We expect these portfolios will be resilient in the coming years as dividends will be a good cushion to the volatile markets driven by the economy that muddles along.
Recent Articles
- Using Asset Classes in Amerivest Guided Portfolios to Construct ETF Portfolios
- Dividend Stock ETFs vs. Dividend Stock Mutual Funds
- Technology Companies Outshine Among Large Cap Growth Stocks
- Economic Indicators Signal Overvalued Stock Markets
- Diversified ETF Portfolios Based on Amerivest Model Portolios
- July Report on the Permanent Portfolio Shows Steady Progress
- Portfolio Playoffs: 2011 Stock Picks
- 5 Biggest Contrarian Plays for July 2011
- 10 Stocks With Rising Dividends From Franklin Templeton's Rising Dividends Fund
- International Treasury Bonds: Fixed Income for Dollar Hedge
- Paul Hickey's Earnings Day Winners Reviewed
- Long-Term Stock Portfolio Play-Offs: Comparing Diverse Ideas
How can we improve this newsletter -- we value your inputs --Thanks to those who have already contributed -- we appreciate it.
Disclaimer:
Any investment in securities including mutual funds, ETFs, closed end funds, stocks and any other securities could lose money over any period of time. All investments involve risk. Losses may exceed the principal invested. Past performance is not an indicator of future performance. There is no guarantee for future results in your investment and any other actions based on the information provided on the website including, but not limited to, strategies, portfolios, articles, performance data and results of any tools.
All rights are reserved and enforced. By accessing the website, you agree not to copy and redistribute the information provided herein without the explicit consent from MyPlanIQ.
comments 0