11/30/2010

In a previous article noted that Variable Annuities have well chosen sub account funds that can lead to a portfolio that can deliver good returns. We now examine the Schwab Select Annuity, compare it with the Fidelity Personal Retirement Annuity and see how well an ETF clone performs

In Summary, the Fidelity Personal Retirement Annuity's plan consists of 56 funds. These funds enable participants to gain exposure to 5 major assets: US Equity, Foreign Equity, REITs, Emerging Market Equity and Fixed Income.

We are now going to build a clone plan and see how it performs. We will simplify the choice and not duplicate styles.

US Funds

The US funds choice is very wide and here we will not mirror all the choices just one in each style category.

International Funds

Similarly we will match one style in each category in the international asset class.

Emerging markets

We select two emerging market ETF's to provide an alternative style.

Real Estate

Real estate is under represented -- an international REIT would strengthen this asset class. We will add an international REIT Fund to the ETF's.

Fixed Income

The fixed income class is well balanced with good choices and diversification. We match this with the exception of having a second intermediate term bond.

We are not attempting to match any of the balanced funds as there is no opportunity to use these in a standalone portfolio. While the managed funds are available, the fee structure is such that the returns are going to leak into other people's pockets and it will pay you to be on top of your own investments -- either directly or through a professional.

We now compare the returns of the two plans using tactical and asset allocation strategies with a moderate risk portfolio.

Performance chart (as of Nov 19, 2010)

Performance table (as of Nov 19, 2010)

The Variable Annuity Portfolios have a clear lead over its ETF clone. The reason for this is the larger number of funds to allow styles rotation.

In fact, to get similar performance using ETF's, you would need to go to one of the richest plans -- provided by TD Ameritrade. The comparison is below.

Performance chart (as of Nov 19, 2010)

Performance table (as of Nov 19, 2010)

One important note is that the returns are before fees are assessed. Variable annuities are complex instruments with fees that can be in excess of 2% of the asset base per year. Even so, the historical returns are good and there is the benefit that gains are not taxed.

Looking at the fund design for Variable Annuities can be instructive to allow you to build a plan that enables portfolios that give you good risk adjusted returns.

labels:investment,

Symbols:AGG,AOK,AOM,BIV,BND,BSV,CIU,CSJ,DBC,DBE,DBN,DBR,DBT,DBU,DEM,DES,DGG,DKA,DLN,DON,DPN,DRF,DSC,DWM,EEM,EFA,EFG,EFV,ELG,ELV,EMG,EMM,EMV,EXI,EZM,GBF,GII,GMM,GWL,HYG,ICF,IGE,IJH,IJJ,IJK,IJR,IOO,IP,IPF,IPW,ITE,IVE,IVV,IVW,IWM,IWP,IWR,IWS,IWV,IWW,IWZ,IXC,IXJ,IXP,

comments(0) 

10/28/2010

comments(2) 

09/17/2010

Frank Armstrong, author of The Informed Investor, proposed thisportfolio for an MSN Money article. The two key points of the portfolio are that it has four asset classes (US, International, REIT, Bonds) and relies on market indices rather than active management.

 

The portfolio uses index funds because index funds eliminate manager risk. It overweights small-cap stocks as small-cap stocks have historically outperformed large caps stocks. The portfolio has a strong value tilt, based on the theory that, over the long haul, beaten-down stocks will perform better than high-flying growth stocks.

This should be a low cost, well performing portfolio.

 

The fund selection for testing the strategy is listed below with the ETF alternatives:

  

• 9.25% in Vanguard Small Cap Value VISVX  (SCZ)
• 9.25% in Vanguard Value VIVAX (SPY, IYY)
• 6.25% in Vanguard Small-Cap Growth VISGX (VBK)
• 6.25% in Vanguard 500 Index VFINX (IVW) 
• 31% in Vanguard Total International Stock VGTSX (EFA)
• 8% in Vanguard REIT VGSIX   (IYR, VNQ, RWX)  
• 30% in Vanguard Short-Term Bond VBISX (BND, AGG)

 

Things to note about the portfolio:

• This is designed as a lazy portfolio with limited rebalancing specified
• With 70% in equities, this would be considered an aggressive portfolio
• REIT is possibly underweighted

 

We will create historical returns of this portfolio as originally planned and then compare against strategic asset allocation (annual rebalance) and tactical asset allocation. This will measure:

• The impact of equal weighting of the equities – bonds will be fixed at 30% -- SAA strategy
• The impact of actively managing the equities – bonds remain fixed at 30% -- TAA strategy

We will then introduce a four asset SIB which will give a measure of the choice of funds. The SAA and TAA strategies will give the same weights to each of the funds but use simpler asset classes funds.

 

4 Asset SIB Breakdown with ETF alternatives

LARGE BLEND                    VTSMX       (VTI)

Foreign Large Blend            VGTSX      (VEU)

REAL ESTATE                     VGSIX        (VNQ)

Intermediate-Term Bond       VBMFX      (BND)

 

 

The results are shown below. There are a number of interesting things to note

• The closest comparison of similar strategies is the Armstrong Original versus the Armstrong SAA. The Armstrong original outperforms SAA which says that overloading the US stocks towards small value is successful
• All of the buy and hold strategies suffer from the “downturn dip” and the tactical asset allocation strategies perform much better
• The difference between the two TAA strategies is negligible 

labels:investment,

Symbols:DIA,IYY,VTI,DVY,ONEQ,QCLN,QABA,PWC,VTV,VUG,IWM,IWO,IWW,MDY,IJJ,IJK,VO,AGG,BND,SHY,VBK,IJS,VBR,IWP,IWS,VEA,EFG,EFV,VWO,VEU,SCZ,SPY,IYR,IVW,RWX,EFA,VNQ,Tactical,Asset,Allocation,asset,allocation,armstong,ideal,index,strategic,asset,allocation,

comments(0) 

09/16/2010

• 10% in Diamonds Trust DIA (SPY)
• 15% in iShares DJ U.S. Total Market IYY (VTI, DVY)
• 7.5% in Fidelity NASDAQ Composite ONEQ (QCLN, QABA)
• 7.5% in Power Shares Dynamic Market PWC (VTV, VUG)
• 10% in iShares Russell 2000 IWM (IWO, IWW)
• 15% in Mid Cap SPDR Trust MDY (IJJ, VO)

International Equities

• 25% in iShares MSCI International EAFE EFA (VEA, EFV)
• 10% in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets EEM (VWO)

• 100% in equities is an aggressive portfolio
• 65% in US equities is high in today’s market environment
• There is no real estate (IYR, VNQ, ICF) or fixed income which would likely result in improved performance today
• With three asset classes (US, international and emerging markets), this can be mapped against a 3 asset class SIB

• Large Blend VTSMX (ETF VTI)
• Foreign Large Blend VGTSX (ETF VEU)
• Intermediate-Term Bond VBMFX  (ETF BND)

• The Lowell SAA and TAA were driven with a 100% in equities -- the TAA strategy will move to fixed income (cash) should the momentum drive it that way, the SAA strategy will not
• The 3 asset SIBs are using an aggressive model portfolio that still includes some fixed income

• The choice of funds, even if diversification enables reasonable returns
• Before the downturn, the original portfolio was outperforming everything except the dynamic allocation of the original strategy
• The strategy falls foul of the 2008/2009 downturn and tracks pretty closely with any buy and hold strategy
• The three asset SIBs have a fixed income fund that enables slightly better performance in choppier market conditions
• The Lowell choice of funds allows the tactical asset allocation strategy to outperform the three asset class SIB with TAA
• The 2008/2009 downturn shows the benefits of a tactical asset allocation – even if it means moving equities to cash

Takeaways:

• The Sower’s growth portfolio is a low maintenance portfolio that is heavily weighted towards US equities. In the long term, there is still confidence in the US economy but following this portfolio and strategy will give you some heartache
• This portfolio was created when the sort of downturn we experienced in 2007/2008 was not envisioned -- it's hard to imagine that this portfolio would still be recommended today
• Migrating to a dynamic strategy with the same funds provides much higher returns. Given a dynamic strategy, it would make sense to add some fixed income such as AGG, BND, SHY, CSJ rather than just cash
• Conventional tactical asset allocation with the right number of asset classes (at least five) still provides the best performance
• ETF’s give you a good degree of choice a good vehicle for any portfolio and with increasing track record, it’s possible to demonstrate good historical performance

labels:investment,

Symbols:DIA,IYY,VTI,DVY,ONEQ,QCLN,QABA,PWC,VTV,VUG,IWM,IWO,IWW,MDY,IJJ,IJK,VO,AGG,BND,SHY,SPY,VBK,IJS,IWP,IWS,VEA,EFG,EFV,VWO,VEU,ETF,Asset,Allocation,Tactical,Asset,Allocation,

comments(0) 

07/09/2010

Portfolio construction consists of the following steps

• Decide personal risk profile which determines the target allocation in risk assets.
• Decide asset allocation method: strategic or tactical or both (strategic does not change target asset allocations while tactical can alter allocations more actively)
• Decide target allocation for each asset in a strategic asset allocation
• Periodically rebalancing portfolios

For a portfolio using strategic asset allocation, with long term target allocation being fixed (and only changed when major events such as approaching to retirement and children college education spending, for example), one can further enhance a portfolio return and reduce the risk by rebalancing and fund selection in an asset class. It is reported that adopting proper timing and way to rebalance a portfolio can improve return and reduce risk (see Daryanani opportunitstic rebalancing article).  In this article, we focus on fund selection.

In a well designed portfolio for retirement plans (401K or IRA), it is a popular practice to have funds with various style exposures. In a stock/equity asset, a fund style is defined as value style (growth/blend/value) and size style (large/mid/small cap). The Morningstar 9 boxes of styles are essentially the combinations of the 3 value and 3 size styles. In a fixed income asset, a fund style is a combination of credit risk (junk/investment grade) and interest rate risk (short/intermediate/long) for corporate bonds or a just interest rate risk for treasury bonds.  In an actively managed portfolio, it is a well recognized and widely practiced method to select funds based on style rotation to improve a portfolio alpha or return. For example, in an article published in Journal of Asset Management (May, 2007), B. Arshanapalli , L. Switzer and K. Panju concluded that active multi-style rotation strategies can be devised to outperform the best performing buy-and-hold portfolio.

MyPlanIQ maintains an index fund based plan or an ETF based plan using candidate funds based on those in a lazy portfolio proposed by Fund Advice Paul Merriman and maintained by MarketWatch.com (called Fund Advice Ultimate Buy and Hold Portfolio) (see here for the independently tracked portfolio on MyPlanIQ.com). The candidate funds and the original allocation are as follows

The funds cover five asset classes: U.S. Equity, International Equity, Emerging Mkt Equity, U.S. REIT and Fixed Income. They have various style exposures for U.S. stock market (equity), International Stocks and Fixed income.

MyPlanIQ Strategic Asset Allocation (SAA) selects funds with the best risk adjusted returns for each asset class when rebalancing.  The following table compares the Strategic Asset Allocation (SAA) moderate portfolios in both index fund and ETF plans as well as the original portfolio (both MyPlanIQ SAA moderate portfolios have 40% allocation in fixed income). We also include the strategic asset allocation moderate portfolio in MyPlanIQ Five Core Asset ETF Plan that consists one fund for each asset class.

As of 7/2/2010

From the above table, we can observe:

• Diversification over styles improves return (FundAdvice Buy and Hold vs. Five Core SAA Moderate).

• Style rotation adds 1.3-1.7% returns over buy and hold (SAA Moderate ETF or Index Funds vs. FundAdvice Buy and Hold).

The above observations are consistent across thousands of plans MyPlanIQ maintains. We should also point out that better fund/style selection does not alter the overall portfolio risk allocation, which is a major advantage over an actively managed tactical asset allocation portfolio.

At the moment, for U.S. stocks, MyPlanIQ SAA favors small cap (IWM), small cap value (IWN). For fixed income, it favors Inflation-protected treasury (TIP).

labels:investments,IRA,401K,

Symbols:vti,spy,veu,efa,vwo,eem,iyr,icf,vnq,dbc,gsg,bnd,agg,tlt,lqd,tip,iwb,oef,iwd,iwo,iwm,ijr,iwn,iwp,iwr,ijh,iws,dvy,iwc,efv,iww,iwv,iwz,VFITX,VFISX,VTRIX,VDMIX,VIPSX,NAESX,VISVX,VIVAX,VFINX,VEIEX,VGSIX,

comments(0) 

12/03/2010

This report reviews Abercrombie Fitch Co. Savings and Retirement Plan plan. We will discuss the investment choices and present the plan rating by MyPlanIQ. Current economic and market conditions are discussed in the context of the investment portfolios in the plan. We will then show how participants in Abercrombie Fitch Co. Savings and Retirement Plan can achieve reasonable investment results using asset allocation strategies.

Plan Review and Rating

--

Abercrombie Fitch Co. Savings and Retirement Plan's 401K plan consists of 24 funds. These funds enable participants to gain exposure to 3 major assets: US Equity, Foreign Equity, Fixed Income. The list of minor asset classes covered:

Foreign Large Growth: EFG
Intermediate-term Bond: AGG, CIU, BIV, BND
Large Blend: IVV, IYY, IWV, VTI, VV, SPY, DLN, RSP, SCHX
Large Growth: IVW, IWZ, JKE, VUG, ELG, QQQQ, RPG, SCHG
Large Value: IVE, IWW, JKF, VTV, ELV, PWV, RPV, SCHV
Mid-cap Value: IJJ, IWS, JKI, VOE, EMV, PWP, RFV, UVU
Moderate Allocation: AOM
Retirement Income:
Small Growth: IJT, IWO, JKK, VBK, DSG, PWT, RZG, UKK
Small Value: IJS, IWN, JKL, VBR, DSV, PWY, RZV, UVT
Target Date 2000-2010: TZD
Target Date 2011-2015: TZE
Target Date 2016-2020: TZG
Target Date 2021-2025: TZI
Target Date 2026-2030: TZL
Target Date 2031-2035: TZO
Target Date 2036-2040: TZV
Target Date 2041-2045:
Target Date 2050+:

As of Dec 2, 2010, this plan investment choice is rated as based on MyPlanIQ Plan Rating methodology that measures the effectiveness of a plan's available investment funds. It has the following detailed ratings:

Diversification -- Rated as (11%)
Fund Quality -- Rated as (40%)
Portfolio Building -- Rated as (59%)
Overall Rating: (39%)

Current Economic and Market Conditions

We have experienced an uncertain 2010: plenty of worries on whether the US economy will climb out of the great recession and recover.

• The Federal Reserve embarked on Quantitative Easing II (QE2) to stimulate the economy.
• The housing market is still at its low but largely stabilized.
• The unemployment rate is stuck at 9%.

Americans continue to face an uncertain future, given (among others) the high unemployment rate, large federal and local government debts and global trade imbalance. With such an economic backdrop, the stock and debt markets are going to be volatile. Despite this, markets have been resilient and appear positioned to rebound.

In this market it is even more critical to properly diversify and respond market changes. MyPlanIQ offers two asset allocation strategies: strategic and tactical asset allocation strategies ( SAA and TAA for participants in Abercrombie Fitch Co. Savings and Retirement Plan).

Strategic Asset Allocation is based on well known modern portfolio theory and its key features include: diversification, proper fund selection and periodically re-balancing.

Tactical Asset Allocation works on a diversified array of assets provided by funds in a plan and adjusts asset mixes based on market conditions such as asset price momentum utilized by TAA.

Portfolio Discussions

The chart and table below show the historical performance of moderate model portfolios employing strategic and tactical asset allocation strategies. For comparison purpose, we also include the moderate model portfolios of a typical 3 asset SIB (Simpler Is Better) plan . This SIB plan has the following candidate index funds and their ETFs equivalent:

US Equity: (SPY or VTI)
Foreign Equity: (EFA or VEU)
Fixed Income: (AGG or BND)

Performance chart (as of Dec 2, 2010)

Performance table (as of Dec 2, 2010)

Currently, asset classes in US Equity (SPY,VTI), Foreign Equity (EFA,VEU) and Fixed Income (AGG,BND) are doing relatively well. These asset classes are available to Abercrombie Fitch Co. Savings and Retirement Plan participants.

To summarize, Abercrombie Fitch Co. Savings and Retirement Plan plan participants can achieve reasonable investment returns by adopting asset allocation strategies that are tailored to their risk profiles.

Symbols: ANF , SPY , VTI , EFA , VEU , AGG , BND , AOM , CIU , BIV , EFG , IVE , IWW , JKF , VTV , ELV , PWV , RPV , SCHV , TZD , TZE , TZG , TZI , TZO , TZL , TZV , IVV , IYY , IWV , VV , DLN , RSP , SCHX , IVW , IWZ , JKE , VUG , ELG , QQQQ , RPG , SCHG , IJJ , IWS , JKI , VOE , EMV , PWP , RFV , UVU , IJS , IWN , JKL , VBR , DSV , PWY , RZV , UVT , IJT , IWO , JKK , VBK , DSG , PWT , RZG , UKK

12/03/2010

12/03/2010

12/03/2010

12/03/2010

12/03/2010

12/03/2010

12/03/2010

12/03/2010

12/07/2010