Top Plans for Brokerages
Vanguard ETF: 7.4%*
Diversified Core: 8.1%*
Six Core Asset ETFs: 7.3%*
*:5 Yr Annualized Return of TAA Moderate Portfolio

...More Plans...

Articles on AGG

  • How Does Your Garden Grow?

    09/16/2010

    Jim Lowell edits MarketWatch's ETF Trader, an investment letter employing a momentum-based exchange-traded-fund strategy for long-term investors. Large/small stocks, proposed his Sower's Growth Portfolio. This is a diversified portfolio of exchange-traded funds.  The view is that a growing economy tends to create a growing portfolio.
     
    This portfolio is heavily equity and US focused. It is a diversified portfolio of exchange-traded funds including Big-caps ETF (DIAIYYONEQ PWC), Midcaps ETF(MDY), Small-caps ETF (IWM) and foreign ETF(EFA).
     
    The fund selection for testing the strategy is listed below with the ETF alternatives:

    US Equities
    • 10% in Diamonds Trust DIA (SPY)
    • 15% in iShares DJ U.S. Total Market IYY (VTI, DVY)
    • 7.5% in Fidelity NASDAQ Composite ONEQ (QCLN, QABA)
    • 7.5% in Power Shares Dynamic Market PWC (VTV, VUG)
    • 10% in iShares Russell 2000 IWM (IWO, IWW)
    • 15% in Mid Cap SPDR Trust MDY (IJJ, VO)

    International Equities

    • 25% in iShares MSCI International EAFE EFA (VEA, EFV)
    • 10% in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets EEM (VWO)
     Things to note about the portfolio:
    • 100% in equities is an aggressive portfolio
    • 65% in US equities is high in today’s market environment
    • There is no real estate (IYR, VNQ, ICF) or fixed income which would likely result in improved performance today
    • With three asset classes (US, international and emerging markets), this can be mapped against a 3 asset class SIB
     
    We will make a comparison of the performance of this portfolio against strategic asset allocation (equally spread assets), tactical asset allocation and against 3 asset class SIB portfolios we discussed in a previous article,
     
    The 3 asset class SIB breakdown
    • Large Blend VTSMX (ETF VTI)
    • Foreign Large Blend VGTSX (ETF VEU)
    • Intermediate-Term Bond VBMFX  (ETF BND)
      
    There are a number things to note about the comparisons:
    • The Lowell SAA and TAA were driven with a 100% in equities -- the TAA strategy will move to fixed income (cash) should the momentum drive it that way, the SAA strategy will not
    • The 3 asset SIBs are using an aggressive model portfolio that still includes some fixed income




    Summary Returns of Lowell's Portfolios
    Annual Returns 1 year 3 Year 5 Year
    Lowell Original 9.04 -5.38 2.25
    Lowell SAA 13.14 -13.6 1.83
    Lowell TAA 6.23 5.26 13.26
    3 SIB SAA 7.03 -3.39 3.29
    3 SIB TAA -4.23 0.63 5.76


    The results are shown above. There are a number of interesting things to note
    :
    • The choice of funds, even if diversification enables reasonable returns
    • Before the downturn, the original portfolio was outperforming everything except the dynamic allocation of the original strategy
    • The strategy falls foul of the 2008/2009 downturn and tracks pretty closely with any buy and hold strategy
    • The three asset SIBs have a fixed income fund that enables slightly better performance in choppier market conditions
    • The Lowell choice of funds allows the tactical asset allocation strategy to outperform the three asset class SIB with TAA
    • The 2008/2009 downturn shows the benefits of a tactical asset allocation – even if it means moving equities to cash


    Takeaways:

    • The Sower’s growth portfolio is a low maintenance portfolio that is heavily weighted towards US equities. In the long term, there is still confidence in the US economy but following this portfolio and strategy will give you some heartache
    • This portfolio was created when the sort of downturn we experienced in 2007/2008 was not envisioned -- it's hard to imagine that this portfolio would still be recommended today
    • Migrating to a dynamic strategy with the same funds provides much higher returns. Given a dynamic strategy, it would make sense to add some fixed income such as AGG, BND, SHY, CSJ rather than just cash
    • Conventional tactical asset allocation with the right number of asset classes (at least five) still provides the best performance
    • ETF’s give you a good degree of choice a good vehicle for any portfolio and with increasing track record, it’s possible to demonstrate good historical performance

     

    labels:investment,

    Symbols:DIA,IYY,VTI,DVY,ONEQ,QCLN,QABA,PWC,VTV,VUG,IWM,IWO,IWW,MDY,IJJ,IJK,VO,AGG,BND,SHY,SPY,VBK,IJS,IWP,IWS,VEA,EFG,EFV,VWO,VEU,ETF,Asset,Allocation,Tactical,Asset,Allocation,

     

    comments(0)  Share/Bookmark

  • John Wasik’s Nano Portfolio Performance Scrutinized

    09/14/2010

    John Wasik has been a professional journalist and author for 30 years specializing in personal finance, the environment, investing and social issues. John has proposed a Nano plan investment portfolio which employs just a handful of index or exchange- traded funds (ETFs) to cover virtually the entire world of bond and stock markets. This portfolio is supposed to be rebalanced annually.

     

    John Wasik presents a classic asset allocation strategy with simple buy and hold.

    • 20% in Vanguard Total Stock Market VIPERS (VTI) – alternatives: SPY, IWM    
    • 20% in Vanguard Total International (VGTSX) – alternatives: EFA, VEU, EEM, VWO, ADRE     
    • 20% in Vanguard REIT VIPERS (VNQ) – alternatives: IYR, ICF
    • 20% in iShares Lehman TIPS Bond (TIP)    
    • 20% in iShares Lehman Aggregate Bond (AGG) – alternative: BND

     
    Things to note about the portfolio:

    • With 40% in fixed income, this would be considered moderate risk
    • With VGTSX covering both international and emerging markets (albeit in one fund) this would be something between a 4 and 5 asset class portfolio
    • VGTSX is not an ETF; while VGTSX can easily be replaced by VEU (Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF) we will keep VGTSX because it has a longer history for back testing

     We will make a comparison of the performance of this portfolio with

    • Rebalancing every month as opposed to every year
    • Simpler Is Better (SIB) portfolios we discussed in a previous article,
    • Tactically managing the portfolio

     The first set of results compares strategic asset allocation performance. What we note is:

    • All portfolios suffer from the sharp downturn and is what is driving the increasing move towards a tactical allocation strategy
    • The lazy portfolio – rebalancing once a year performs as well as the monthly rebalancing
    • Wasik’s portfolio performance matches the 4 Asset SIB closely
    • The extra asset class in the 5 asset SIB enables it to outperform everything else

     

    Wasik's portfolio against SIBs
     Annualized Returns 1 year 3 years 5 years
    Wasik original 16,75 1.22 5.03
    Wasik monthly rebalance 16,27 0.18 4.39
    4 SIB SAA 15.11 1.08 4.37
    5 SIB SAA 15 2.35 6.33


    The second set of results compares tactical asset allocation performance. What we note is:

    • The tactical asset allocation strategies clearly mitigate the downturn
    • Wasik’s portfolio performance matches the 4 Asset SIB closely when tactical asset allocation strategies are applied to both
    • The extra asset class in the 5 asset SIB enables it to outperform everything else

     Annualized Returns 1 year 3 years 5 years
    Wasik TAA 16.53 8.47 10.43
    4 SIB TAA 15.67 6.65 9.04
    5 SIB TAA 12.62 8.13 11.35

     
    Takeaways:

    • ETF’s are a good vehicle for any portfolio and with increasing track record, it’s possible to demonstrate good historical performance
    • It is increasingly clear that deploying a tactical asset allocation strategy is key. All buy and hold strategies are going to suffer the same downturn properties and with choppy market conditions, minimizing downside risk is critical
    • With a buy and hold, there is little difference between monthly or annual rebalancing so you can be very lazy if you don’t mind the downside!
    • Five asset classes perform better in all cases – in the TAA case, the five asset SIB gives you an extra 6% a year since inception – doubling the asset base every decade

    labels:investments,

    Symbols:ti,vnq,tip,agg,veu,spy,iwm,efa,iyr,icf,bnd,eem,vwo,adre,

    comments(0)  Share/Bookmark

  • Practical and Effective ETF Based 401K Plan

    07/29/2010

    ETF’s are increasingly popular but they have had limited exposure in current 401K plans. However, their low expense ratios are very appealing as is their liquidity or lack of restrictions. In this article, we are going to examine the  ShareBuilder 401k plan that is popular with small business owners.
     
    The final measure of success of a plan is the risk adjusted return. In order for this to be achieved, the plan must have good funds in a variety of asset classes. In a previous article we established the benefit of having four or more (six is desirable) asset classes represented.
     
    Sharebuilder offers 401(k) plans for any office size from one person shops to growing business with 250 or more employees, ShareBuilder 401k from ING Direct delivers all the latest features like auto-rebalancing, auto-enrollment and Roth 401(k). Setting up a 401(k) with ShareBuilder 401k takes just 10-20 minutes online.

    Sharebuilders 100% index-based approach reduces fund expenses and fees and offers 15 well known Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) and a money-market fund.  The fund line-up covers US equities, International Equity, Emerging Markets, Real Estate, and Fixed Income.

    In addition, Sharebuilder offers  five model portfolios from Stable to Aggressive. In this instance, the balanced portfolio was selected and will be compared with moderate portfolios created by MyPlanIQ for Strategic and Tactical Asset Allocation.

    The Sharebuilder balanced portfolio as of July 2010 comprises:
     
    Asset Class
    Ticker
    Portfolio %
    US Equity
    IWD, IWF, IWM
    52.00%
    International Equity
    EFA
    3.00%
    Fixed Income
    TIP, AGG
    45.00%
     
    MyPlanIQ will use a five asset class portfolio. With a moderate rating (fixed income 40%), this is similar to the balanced moderate model portfolio offered by Sharebuilder. The Strategic Asset Allocation moderate portfolio comprises:
     
    Asset Class
    Ticker
    Portfolio %
    US Equity
    DVY, MDY
    15.00%
    International Equity
    EFA
    15.00%
    Emerging Market
    EEM
    15.00%
    Real Estate
    ICF
    15.00%
    Fixed Income
    AGG
    40.00%
     
    The TAA portfolio changes with market conditions and as of July 2010 comprises
    Asset Class
    Ticker
    Portfolio %
    US Equity
     
     
    International Equity
     
     
    Emerging Market
     
     
    Real Estate
    ICF
    29.00%
    Fixed Income
    AGG, IEF
    71.00%
     
    Note that the Tactical Asset Allocation is heavily weighted towards fixed income as a reflection of the current volatility in the market. The asset class weightings change on a monthly basis depending on the price momentum of each of the asset classes.
     
    Portfolios
     1 year AR  
     3 year AR  
     5 year AR  
    Balanced
    13.5%
    -0.08%
    3.36. %
    SAA
    17%
    -2%
    5%
    TAA
    17%
    4%
    10%
     
     
     
     


    Each of the portfolios exhibit different returns performance. It should be noted, however, that 401K plans are long term in nature and so the 5 year AR is the most meaningful.

    What are the takeaways?
    • 401K plans based on ETF’s are available and provide a low cost and effective retirement alternative
    • Increasingly ETF’s play a central role in retiirement plans. You should push your benefits department to increase the number of ETF’s in your plan.
    • Having  five asset classes delivers better results
    • While there is continued volatility in the market, a dynamic portfolio clearly improves returns
    • Retirement is for the long haul and so it’s important to build the right portfolio based on the longer term returns

    Symbols:agg,dvy,eem,efa,icf,iwd,iwf,tip,

    labels:401K,IRA,Retirement,Investment,

    comments(1)  Share/Bookmark

  • Schwab ETFs Review

    07/27/2010

    In June, Schwab announced reducing expenses for their proprietary ETFs. This, along with recently announced commission free ETF trading from Schwab, Vanguard and Fidelity, represents an important and promising trend for ETFs in portfolio building. The following is the comparison among similar ETFs from Schwab, Vanguard and iShares. 

      Schwab Vanguard iShares
    Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF SCHB (0.06%) VTI (0.07%) IWV(0.21%)
    Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF SCHX (0.08%) VV (0.12%) IVV (0.09%)
    Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF SCHG (0.13%) VUG (0.14%) IVW (0.18%)
    Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF SCHV (0.13%) VTV (0.14%) IVE (0.18%)
    Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF SCHA (0.13%) VB (0.14%) IJR (0.20%)
    Schwab International Equity ETF SCHF (0.13%) VEA (0.14%) EFA (0.35%)
    Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF SCHC (0.35%) VSS (0.40%) SCZ (0.40%)
    Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF SCHE (0.25%) VWO (0.27%) EEM (0.72%)

    So far, Schwab ETFs are all equity (stock) index based funds that include U.S. stocks, international stocks and emerging market equity. Compared with iShares or even Vanguard, Schwab has been late in the game and their ETFs have short history. However, Schwab has a relatively good record in their mutual funds that are managed using quantitative models. That experience using quantitative models in their portfolio management certainly can help their ETF management.  Ultimately, what it really matters for investors are the total returns of ETFs that reflect both expenses (taken out from asset under management, usually monthly) and fund performance before fee. The following is the total annualized return table for ETFs from Schwab, Vanguard and iShares up to 7/23/2010. All performance data are calculated from Schwab ETFs’ inception date.

      Schwab Vanguard iShares
    Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (inception 11/03/2009) SCHB (11.78%) VTI (11.09%) IWV(11.9%)
    Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (inception 11/03/2009) SCHX (10.57%) VV (9.54%) IVV (9.37%)
    Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (inception 1/4/2010) SCHG (-4.23%) VUG (-4.72%) IVW (-5.81%)
    Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (inception 12/15/2009) SCHV (1.48%) VTV (1.06%) IVE (0.5%)
    Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (inception 11/03/2009) SCHA (23.92%) VB (23.25%) IJR (22.08%)
    Schwab International Equity ETF (inception 11/03/2009) SCHF (-0.01%) VEA (-2.25%) EFA (-4.03%)
    Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (inception 1/14/2010) SCHC (-9.51%) VSS (-8.43%) SCZ (-11.14%)
    Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF (inception 1/14/2010) SCHE (-3.09%) VWO (-2.49%) EEM (-5.77%)

    From their short history, it is very  impressive that almost all of Schwab ETFs deliver better or no worse total returns: all Schwab ETFs outperform their iShares counterparts while, compared with Vanguard,  only SCHE (emerging mkt equity) and SCHC (international small cap) slightly underperform Vanguard VWO and VSS respectively. Coupled with commission free trades for these ETFs, Schwab ETFs are very enticing for investors. The main drawback, however, is that Schwab does not offer ETFs in other major asset classes, especially in fixed income (it was reported that Schwab will soon provide fixed income ETFs). To build an effective portfolio, investors are forced to use other ETFs to cover missing major asset classes such as fixed income. Schwab charges $8.95 per trade for ETFs provided by other parties.

    MyPlanIQ maintains Schwab Commission Efficient ETFs Plan. Since Schwab's ETFs only cover Domestic and International Equities, the additional ETFs are used to include other major asset classes including US REIT (IYR), Global REIT (IGR), Commodities (DBC, GLD), International Bonds (BWX), Fixed Incomes and Long/Intermediate/Short US Treasury Bonds (TLT, IEI, SHY) and High Yield Junk Bond (JNK). These additional ETFs are not commission free in a Schwab brokerage account. The strategic and tactical asset allocation moderate portfolios have the following performance:

      1 Yr Annual Return 3 Year Annual Return 5 Year Annual Return
    Strategic Asset Allocation Moderate 20% 0% 3%
    Tactical Asset Allocation Moderate 4% 5% 6%

    In conclusion, like Vanguard ETFs, Schwab proprietary ETFs offer compelling values for portfolio building: low cost and commission free. To make their ETFs widely usable and competitive to iShares, however, Schwab (as well as Vanguard) needs to help to increase trading volume for these ETFs so that the tracking errors/friction could be reduced. This is perhaps the major important remaining obstacle for these ETFs to become staples for portfolios.

     labels:ETFs,brokerage,

    Symbols:schb,vti,iwv,schx,vv,ivv,schg,vug,ivw,schv,vtv,ive,scha,vb,ijr,schf,vea,efa,schc,vss,scz,sche,vwo,eem,iyr,icf,igr,dbc,gld,bwx,tlt,iei,shy,jnk,iyg,agg,bnd,

    comments(0)  Share/Bookmark

  • Break Free of your Bonds

    07/19/2010

    Plain-vanilla investment-grade bond funds mostly have kept out of harm's way and provided a return of roughly 4.4% in the first half of 2010. By comparison, the typical U.S. stock fund dropped 5.3%. But, with rates on two-year Treasuries hitting a record low of 0.582% on June 29, and the 10-year note dropping to a minuscule 2.88% on July 1, just how much lower can they go? And what are an investor's alternatives if rates start to creep higher? The longer-term effects of such a huge increase in government spending and debt, not just in the U.S. but worldwide, are pretty well documented. Eventually inflation—and interest rates—go up, too. Better to hedge your bets now than to get run over by the bond-fund crowd later.  

    Diversify your holding—in a rising rate environment the longest maturities will be the worst performers—is key.

    Investment advisor Claymore Securities last month launched a family of seven investment-grade corporate bond ETFs, Claymore BulletShares 2011 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCB), the Claymore BulletShares 2017 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCH). The annual expense ratio on the funds is just 0.24%. There are even less expensive choices.  Vanguard Intermediate Bond ETF (BIV), which was up 7.5% year-to-date through July 8. Other low-cost alternatives providing broad diversification include the Vanguard Total Bond Market Intermediate Bond ETF (BND), the iShares Barclays Aggregate Bond (AGG) and the iShares Barclays 1-3 Year Credit Bond (CSJ). All three posted positive rates of return in 2008.

    MyPlanIQ SAA favors a diversified portfolio not just bonds but asset based ETF's all of which have low expense ratios and provide good returns.

     

    Full Story

    labels:investments,IRA,

    Symbols:BSCH,BIV,AGG,CSJ,

    comments(0)  Share/Bookmark

  • Investing with Styles Can Pay off

    07/09/2010

  • Understanding and Building Your ETF Portfolio

    06/27/2010

  • The Mystery Advisers

    06/09/2010

  • David Swensen's Six Asset Investment Plan

    06/09/2010

  • Selecting Candidate ETFs for Effective Portfolio Building

    06/03/2010

First   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   Last  

Members enjoy Free features

  • Customize and follow a diversified strategic allocation portfolio for your 401k, IRA and brokerage investments within minutes
  • Receive monthly or quarterly re-balance emails
  • Enter funds and percentages in your portfolio, see its historical performance and receive ongoing rebalance emails
  • Real time fund ranking and selection for your plans
  • Quality retirement investing newsletter emails
  • Fund ranking and selection for your plans

Tens of thousands of users have signed up!

Join Now (Free)
No Credit Card Required

User names can only consist of alphabetic and
numeric characters.(eg: 0-9a-zA-Z)
I agree to the Terms of use

Login With Facebook:

Get Started Now. It's Free!

Get portfolio suggestions for your
401k plan or brokerage accounts

Powered by MyPlanIQ
You have created an account on MyPlanIQ.com by using this email "", please login MyPlanIQ account or reset your password.