Re-balance Cycle Reminder All MyPlanIQ’s newsletters are archived here.
For regular SAA and TAA portfolios, the next re-balance will be on Monday, March 28, 2016. You can also find the re-balance calendar for 2015 on ‘Dashboard‘ page once you log in.
As a reminder to expert users: advanced portfolios are still re-balanced based on their original re-balance schedules and they are not the same as those used in Strategic and Tactical Asset Allocation (SAA and TAA) portfolios of a plan.
Please note that we now list the next re-balance date on every portfolio page.
Defined Maturity Bond Fund Analysis
When it comes to bond fund investing, it is a common concern for many fixed income investors: most bond funds have no fixed or defined maturity. Many investors have a predictable or preset time to invest a chunk of money. For example, they might want to invest this money for five years and then take it out for junior’s college or purchase a house. A normal bond fund, however, invests continuously in a collection of individual bonds. These holdings will be sold or closed (if they are mature) and the proceeds are used to purchase other bonds. Thus, a bond fund never matures and investing in bond funds can subject investors to price volatility or even loss. Suze Orman, for example, disavowed bond funds and suggested her audience to purchase individual bonds instead.
However, investing individual bonds requires large amount of capital: an individual bond might require at least $1000 and normally $5000 or so to purchase. To achieve reasonable diversification, you might need $10,000 or $50,000 at least. What’s more, it’s hard to do due diligence to select individual bonds.
Defined maturity (also called target maturity) bond funds such as Guggenheim Bullet Shares ETFs can help to alleviate the two problems mentioned above. These funds usually have a definite maturity. For example, BSJF (Guggenheim BulletShrs2015 HY CorpBd ETF) is an ETF that matured in 2015 (last year). It invests in high yield corporate bonds that matured by the end of 2015.
We first covered these ETFs in October 14, 2013: Manage Cash Investments Smartly. In this newsletter, we will review how Guggenheim Bullet Shares 2015 ETFs have fared.
Bullet Shares 2015 Corporate Bond ETFs Performance
Let’s first look at the two corporate bond ETFs, compared with other traditional normal bond ETFs:
Fund Name |
Expense Ratio |
Duration |
0.42% |
||
0.4% |
2.42 Yrs |
|
0.3% |
2.47 Yrs |
|
0.55% |
2.01 Yrs |
|
0.40% |
4.3 Yrs |
|
0.42% |
||
0.15% |
2.41 Yrs |
|
0.1% |
2.74 Yrs |
The Bullet Shares defined maturity ETFs have 0.42% expense ratio. This is way too high, considering its low maintenance and short term maturity. This actually can materially hurt returns dramatically, especially in the current low rate environment (more on this later). With 0.1% expense ratio, VCSH (Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF), again, sets a good example and yard stick in terms of low and meaningful expenses.
The two defined maturity ETFs normally invest in about 30 to 70 securities. However, as time goes, they each have to rebalance due to callable events and the actual maturities.
Notice that for BSCF, it invests in investment grade corporate bonds only. The following shows its credit quality breakdown as of 9/30/2015 (see here):
We believe that the reason some of bond holdings were rated as BBB levels is due to their rating downgrade. A bond might start to be of investment grade quality and at some point, degraded to a lower quality or even a junk bond status. It will only be rebalanced out at the beginning of a year.
Now, let’s take a look at the returns:
Ticker/Portfolio Name |
From Inception to 12/31/2015* |
2015 |
2014 |
1Yr AR |
3Yr AR |
5Yr AR |
4.7% |
1.7% |
0.4% |
1.7% |
2.7% |
|
|
1.5% |
-6.3% |
-1.3% |
-7.8% |
-0.9% |
|
|
-2.5% |
-7.7% |
0.3% |
-8.7% |
|
|
|
3.1% |
-5% |
-0.1% |
-6.5% |
0.3% |
|
|
3% |
-6.8% |
0.8% |
-8.8% |
-0.3% |
2.9% |
|
2.9% |
0.5% |
0% |
0.5% |
0.7% |
2.4% |
|
N/A (inception 10/17/13) |
0.1% |
1.6% |
-0.8% |
|
|
|
2.8% |
1.1% |
1.8% |
0.8% |
1.4% |
2.5% |
*Annualized returns. BSJF Inception: 1/26/2011. BSCF Inception: 6/8/2010. The high yield bond funds are compared with BSJF while corporate bond funds are compared with BSCF using their inception dates respectively.
For high yield bonds, BSJF’s annualized 4.7% since 1/26/2011 has bested all other comparable high yield bond ETFs in the table. What is more, though not that significant for investors who hold the bond fund till its maturity, it didn’t lose money in 2014 and 2015. In 2015, all other high yield bonds lost more than 5%. Its overall annualized return is 1.6% better than the second best fund HYS’s 3.1%.
For corporate bonds, BSCF’s 2.9% annual return is not that much better than VCSH’s 2.8%. Notice that in the current low yield environment, the 0.42% expense ratio made a big difference. In our opinion, such a high expense ratio makes investing in defined maturity ETFs less compelling.
Conclusions
Currently, interest rates are extremely low. If the Federal Reserve decides to continue its planned interest raise this year, bond prices can decline. It thus makes sense to look at some of these defined maturity ETFs. However, we are concerned with the high expense ratio of these ETFs, especially for investment grade corporate bonds (as they pay much lower interests than high yield bonds). On the other hand, high yield bonds have been hit hard recently (though they have recovered and had a positive return year to date now). Investors who have such definite maturity need can wait for a good price entry point to consider some of these ETFs.
In addition to Guggenheim Bullet Shares ETFs, iShares and Fidelity also offer defined maturity ETFs and mutual funds. The Guggenheim Bullet Shares ETFs are commission free in Charles Schwab.
Market Overview
Last week, investors had a relief because of better expected employment data and ISM data: ISM Manufacturing PMI for February 2016 was 49.5 percent, still in the contraction mode but 1.3% better than January’s 48.2 percent while the service index was 53.4, at an expansion mode. Global stocks have recovered significantly. Furthermore, high yield bonds, one of the yard sticks to measure credit risk, has recovered and now had a positive year to date return, Stocks are now back to a very overvalued level. In fact, even though S&P 500 index is still lower year to date, S&P 500 companies’ PE ratio is actually higher than at the beginning of the year as earnings have declined. As we stated previously, we believe the fundamentals will further dictate the price action in the next several months. We are not completely out of wood yet. The best action is to stay on course.
For more detailed asset trend scores, please refer to 360° Market Overview.
We would like to remind our readers that markets are more precarious now than other times in the last 6 years. Since the financial crisis in 2008-2009, we have not seen meaningful or substantial structural change in the U.S., European and emerging market economies. Even though U.S. stocks have had a recent correction, their valuation is still at a historical high level. It is thus a good time and imperative to adjust to a risk level you are comfortable with right now.
We again would like to stress for any new investor and new money, the best way to step into this kind of markets is through dollar cost average (DCA), i.e. invest and/or follow a model portfolio in several phases (such as 2 or 3 months) instead of the whole sum at one shot.
Latest Articles
- February 29, 2016: Smart Strategic Asset Allocation Rebalance When Market Trend Changes
- February 22, 2016: Be Cash Smart
- February 15, 2016: Bond ETF Portfolios
- February 8, 2016: Newsletter Collection Update
- February 1, 2016: Total Return Bond Fund Portfolios In A Volatile Period
- January 25, 2016: Alternative Portfolios Review
- January 18, 2016: Strategic Asset Allocation: A Cautious Outlook
- January 11, 2016: Review Of Trend Following Tactical Asset Allocation
- January 4, 2016: What Worked And Didn’t In 2015
- December 21, 2015: Distressed Assets
- December 14, 2015: High Yield Bonds And Their Correlation With Stocks
- December 7, 2015: Diversification And Global Allocation
- November 30, 2015: Investors and Speculators Combined
- November 23, 2015: Active Stock Fund Performance Consistency
- November 16, 2015: Permanent, Risk Parity And Alternative Portfolios Review
- November 9, 2015: Broad Base Core Mutual Fund Review
- November 2, 2015: Broad Base Index Core ETFs Review
- October 26, 2015: Total Return Bond Fund Review
- October 19, 2015: Advanced Portfolio Review
- October 12, 2015: What About Commodities?
- October 5, 2015: Core Satellite Portfolios In A 401k Account
- September 28, 2015: Risk Managed Strategic Asset Allocation Portfolios Revisited
- September 21, 2015: Quest For The Best Investment Strategy
- September 14, 2015: Core Satellite Portfolios In Market Turmoil
- September 7, 2015: Market Rout Creates An Opportunity to Reposition Your Portfolios
- August 31, 2015: Review of Asset Allocation Funds and Portfolios
- August 24, 2015: Market Rout And Your Portfolios
- August 17, 2015: ETF or Mutual Fund Based Portfolios
- August 10, 2015: Updated Newsletter Collection
- August 3, 2015: Slippery Asset Trends
- July 27, 2015: Performance Dispersion Among Momentum Based Portfolios
- July 20, 2015: Global Balanced Portfolio Benchmarks
- July 13, 2015: Pain in Tactical Portfolios
- July 6, 2015: Fixed Income Total Return Bond Funds In Strategic Asset Allocation Portfolios
- June 29, 2015: Core ETF Commission Free Portfolios
- June 22, 2015: Secular Asset Trends
- June 15, 2015: Giving Up Bonds?
- June 1, 2015: Summer Blues?
- May 26, 2015: Cash, Bonds and Stocks In A Rising Rate Environment
- May 18, 2015: Portfolio Update
- May 11, 2015: Pain in Fixed Income?
- May 4, 2015: The Balanced Stock and Long Term Treasury Bond Portfolios
- April 27, 2015: Long Term Treasury Bond Behavior
- April 20, 2015: 529 College Savings Plan Rebalance Policy Change
- April 13, 2015: Total Return Bond Funds As Smart Cash
- April 6, 2015: The Low Return Environment
- March 30, 2015: Brokerage Specific Core Mutual Fund Portfolios 2
- March 23, 2015: Investment Arithmetic for Long Term Investments
- March 16, 2015: Brokerage Specific Core Mutual Fund Portfolios
- March 9, 2015: Newsletter Collection Update
- March 2, 2015: Total Return Bond ETFs
- February 23, 2015: Why Is Global Tactical Asset Allocation Not Popular?
- February 16, 2015: Where Are Permanent Portfolios Going?
- February 9, 2015: How Have Asset Allocation Funds Done?
- February 2, 2015: Risk Management Everywhere
- January 26, 2015: Composite Portfolios Review
- January 19, 2015: Fixed Income Investing Review
- January 12, 2015: How Does Trend Following Tactical Asset Allocation Strategy Deliver Returns
- January 5, 2015: When Forecast Fails
- December 22, 2014: Long Term Asset Returns: How Long Is Long?
- December 15, 2014: Beaten Down Assets
- December 8, 2014: Implementing Core Asset Portfolios In a Brokerage
- December 1, 2014: Two Key Issues of Investment Strategies
- November 24, 2014: Holiday Readings
- November 17, 2014: Retirement Spending Portfolios Update
- November 10, 2014: Fixed Income Or Cash
- November 3, 2014: Asset Trend Review
- October 27, 2014: Investment Loss, Mistakes And Market Cycles
- October 20, 2014: Strategic Portfolios With Managed Volatility
- October 13, 2014: Embrace Volatility
- October 6, 2014: Tips For 401k Open Enrollment
- September 29, 2014: What Can We Learn From Bill Gross’ Departure From PIMCO?
- September 22, 2014: Why Total Return Bond Funds?
- September 15, 2014: Equity And Total Return Bond Fund Composite Portfolios
- September 8, 2014: Momentum Based Portfolios Review
- September 1, 2014: Risk & Diversification: Mint.com Interview
- August 25, 2014: Remember Risk
- August 18, 2014: Consistency, The Most Important Edge In Investing: Tactical Case
- August 11, 2014: What To Do In Overvalued Stock Markets
- August 4, 2014: Is This The Peak Or Correction?
- July 28, 2014: Stock Musings
- July 21, 2014: Permanent Portfolios & Four Pillar Foundation Based Framework
- July 14, 2014: Composite Portfolios Review
- July 7, 2014: Portfolio Behavior During Market Corrections
- June 30, 2014: Half Year Brokerage ETF and Mutual Fund Portfolios Review
- June 23, 2014: Newsletter Collection Update
- June 16, 2014: There Are Always Lottery Winners
- June 9, 2014: The Arithmetic of Investment Mistakes
- June 2, 2014: Tips On Portfolio Rebalance
- May 26, 2014: In Praise Of Low Cost Core Asset Class Based Portfolios
- May 19, 2014: Consistency, The Most Important Edge In Investing: Strategic Case
- May 12, 2014: How To Handle An Elevated Overvalued Market
- May 5, 2014: Asset Allocation Funds Review
- April 28, 2014: Now The Economy Backs To The ‘Old Normal’, Should Our Investments Too?
- April 21, 2014: Total Return Bond Investing In The Current Market Environment
Enjoy Newsletter
How can we improve this newsletter? Please take our survey
–Thanks to those who have already contributed — we appreciate it.